Keep in mind, he is apparently a special ops guy and very well trained in using firearms. And probably trained/skilled in injuring versus killing assailants or attackers.
If he were merely defending himself, why did was he so intent on leaving them dead versus scaring them off?
If they were petty robbers, wouldn't a few shots have been sufficient to injure, scare them away?
Has anyone published a detailed, "frame-by-frame", eyewitness account of the whole incident from start to finish?|||I kind of think you have answered your own question. If he was 'a special ops guy' then shooting to kill would be par for the course for him.
What can't fight back can't hurt you.|||Scenario: You are on your way to work. Yes, you are armed because you need to be where you work and given the dangerous job you do. You are approached in a hostile way by others carrying loaded weapons. Chances are they know just who you are and what your job is. Chances are they are out to take you out. Now, just how dead do you want those people to be, before they get the chance to put 30 bullets in you? Think about it.|||dead people can't kill you. if you have to shoot(pray that you never do)shoot to kill
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment